I read the first book on my list for the 2009 YA Novel Challenge this weekend (Marked, A House of Night Book by P.C. and Kristen Cast), and tacked the sequel “Betrayed” on for good measure.
I really wish I would have started The Challenge out on a better foot. Based on the beautiful, mature and artistic cover art for this series, I thought I would be reading mysterious, slightly dark novels about the twists and turns students lives take as they complete their transformations and become vampires. I thought I would be reading something alternative and edgy, and I was curious to see what happens when a mother and daughter team-write a book.
Unfortunately, what I actually read was a Baby Sitters Club book, disguised as a Harry Potter book with a female lead. Guess I shouldn’t judge a book by it’s cover, eh?
The “House” books I read felt like Baby Sitter Club books because the protagonist (Zoey) always knows what has to be done, it’s never that hard to do, she wins with ease, and the rest of the books are filled with fluffy movie marathons or predictable escapades to the Starbucks and the library. Really, most of the books are spent over-using the following words:
• Yummy. Or any other food related analogy to describe cute boys.
• Ho. Zoey keeps telling us she’s not a ho, but her “nemesis” (Aphrodite) wears short skirts, dances provacatively and gives a guy a blow job, so she is definitely a ho. Nevermind that Zoey lusts after three different guys, calls two of them her “boyfriends” and experiences intense blood lust (aka, sexual arousal). Whether Zoey and Aphrodite are Ho’s or they aren’t is up for debate, but it is ridiculously hypocritical to think that they are on different playing fields with their sexuality.
• Poop. It’s ridiculous that a High Preistess in Training, a vampyre especially blessed by their goddess Nyx, complains that she looks like “poop.” Please, please can’t we have a more sophisticated word for such a highly important vampyre? Perhaps something as interesting and unique as we are told she is?
• Gay. I was tipped over the “I’m offended line” after Zoey told us how “gay” her homosexual friend Damien is (after he admits he likes cross stitch, after he gushes over a pair of shoes, etc.) for the ten billionth time. Please. I know your friend is gay, and I like that there is a gay character in these novels. However, you are diminishing the depth of his character when the only adjective you use to describe him is used as an “excuse” for his behavior.
I found myself frequently comparing these books to Harry Potter because they both take place at boarding schools filled with mythical beings, and the protagonist in each is a “chosen one” of sorts. But as stated earlier, everything is easy (and thus, boring) for Zoey. She always makes the right decision, everyone accepts what she says as holy truth, and does not get angry at her when she hurts them. Harry angers his friends on occasion, the public rarely believes what he says, and he even makes a few poor decisions. He also still manages to save the day in the end (and several times along the way) and is a beloved character in literature.
The premise that the Cast author present is very intriguing: a chosen vampyre, a boarding school, a church that apposes vampyres with vengeance, cool tattoos, and some Native American lore. Unfortunately, the poor writing just doesn’t live up to the potential of the story.
One question that keeps haunting me is this: why do I so freely criticize these books when I adore the not-so-brilliantly-written (but definitely better than "House") Twilight books?